[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why p11-kit-1 instead of p11-kit?
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: Why p11-kit-1 instead of p11-kit? |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:01:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111114 Icedove/3.1.16 |
On 03/15/2012 10:41 PM, Jim Lloyd wrote:
> Sorry to bug the list with this question, but this seems to be a case where
> Google does not know all.
>
> I'm attempting to build gnutls 2.12.17 on CentOS 6.0 x86-64. I'm doing this
> specifically for PKCS11 support, which we are adding to an existing product.
>
> I have built and installed p11-kit 0.12. But when I configure gnutls I get
> this error:
>
> checking for P11_KIT... configure: error: Package requirements (p11-kit-1
>> = 0.11) were not met:
> No package 'p11-kit-1' found
>
> Why p11-kit-1 instead of p11-kit? Does this indicate that I need a forked
> variant of p11-kit?
Not really. p11-kit advertises itself as p11-kit-1. You might want to
check config.log for the reason of non-detection.
regards,
Nikos