[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipse
From: |
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos |
Subject: |
Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Nov 2011 10:38:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20111010 Icedove/3.1.15 |
On 10/19/2011 11:49 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I’ve reproduced it on armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi, with Guile 1.8.8,
> GCC 4.5.1, and glibc 2.12.
> The 0x1 above seems to be the value of some port’s ‘putback_buf’ field.
> Normally it should be either NULL or a valid pointer.
> Adding ‘c_port->putback_buf = NULL’ in
> $GNUTLS/guile/src/core.c:make_session_record_port, which is supposed to
> be a non-functional change, leads to a malloc inconsistency much more
> quickly (setting $MALLOC_CHECK_=2 helps catch it.)
> So I’m starting to wonder if libguile and GnuTLS somehow have a
> different vision of the layout of ‘scm_t_port’, which would explain
> these inconsistencies.
Hi,
Any update on that? Do the observed issue seem related to a gnulib change?
regards,
Nikos
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel,
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <=
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/06
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/11/06
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/06
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/11/06
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/06
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/11/06
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Andreas Metzler, 2011/11/07
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Ludovic Courtès, 2011/11/07
- Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos, 2011/11/07
Re: guile testsuite failure (gnutls 3.0.1 and later) and armel and mipsel, Andreas Metzler, 2011/11/12