[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TLS Renegotiation problem
From: |
Steve Dispensa |
Subject: |
Re: TLS Renegotiation problem |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:27:00 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 |
On 11/10/09 12:13 PM, "Florian Weimer" <address@hidden> wrote:
> * Simon Josefsson:
>
>> So, in summary, given (my) current knowledge there is no need to either
>> patch GnuTLS or any server application using GnuTLS.
>
> But GNUTLS would have to implement the extension to secure connections
> to servers which support renegotiation.
(...which support safe renegotiation using the extension - no such thing as
safe renegotiation absent both client and server supporting the extension.)
-Steve
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, (continued)
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Daniel Kahn Gillmor, 2009/11/09
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Tomas Hoger, 2009/11/12
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Tomas Hoger, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Steve Dispensa, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Florian Weimer, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem,
Steve Dispensa <=
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Florian Weimer, 2009/11/10
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Tomas Hoger, 2009/11/11
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Simon Josefsson, 2009/11/17
- Re: TLS Renegotiation problem, Tomas Hoger, 2009/11/18