[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?
From: |
Stephane Bortzmeyer |
Subject: |
Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls? |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:01:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 09:28:29AM +0200,
Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> wrote
a message of 94 lines which said:
> The problem is for GPLv2-only projects that wants to use a LGPLv3
> library.
:-(
My case: http://echoping.sourceforge.net/
Since echoping has the OpenSSL exception, switching GNUTLS to LGPLv3
would mean dropping GNUTLS support, just to please the FSF lawyers.
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, (continued)
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, David Marín Carreño, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Werner Koch, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Colin Leroy, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Werner Koch, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Alvaro Lopez Ortega, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Alvaro Lopez Ortega, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer <=
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Werner Koch, 2008/09/10
- Re: Using LGPLv3+ license for libgnutls?, Simon Josefsson, 2008/09/10