[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #256
From: |
Wolfgang Lux |
Subject: |
Re: Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #256 |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Aug 2012 14:26:54 +0200 |
Gregory Casamento wrote:
> I turned off notifications for now....
>
> I'm wondering why I would need to do a distclean since I'm deleting
> the entire working directory each time. I didn't think I had to.
Maybe you intended to clean the working directory before a build, but from the
logs it is clear that this doesn't happen. Looking at this excerpt from build
#256, you clearly see that Jenkins is updating an existing source tree and not
checking out a fresh copy.
U dev-apps/easydiff/ChangeLog
U dev-apps/easydiff/DiffWrapper.m
At revision 35397
Fetching 'http://svn.gna.org/svn/gnustep/apps/gorm/trunk' at -1 into
'/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/gnustep/workspace/dev-apps/gorm'
At revision 35397
Wolfgang
- Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #253, greg . casamento, 2012/08/09
- Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #254, greg . casamento, 2012/08/09
- Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #255, greg . casamento, 2012/08/09
- Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #256, greg . casamento, 2012/08/09
- Re: Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #256, Riccardo Mottola, 2012/08/10
- Re: Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #256, Gregory Casamento, 2012/08/10
- Re: Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #256, Wolfgang Lux, 2012/08/11
- Re: Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #256, Gregory Casamento, 2012/08/11
- Re: Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #256,
Wolfgang Lux <=
- Re: Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #256, Gregory Casamento, 2012/08/11
- Re: Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #256, Gregory Casamento, 2012/08/11
- Build failed in Jenkins: gnustep #257, greg . casamento, 2012/08/11
- Jenkins build is back to normal : gnustep #258, greg . casamento, 2012/08/11