gnustep-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Valgrind doesn't always work with libobjc2


From: Fred Kiefer
Subject: Re: Valgrind doesn't always work with libobjc2
Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 18:19:18 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120421 Thunderbird/12.0

You better report this on Valgrind see this old link on similar problems:

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=315064


You will have to provide the whole instructions within selector_insert() for them to track down the issue.
See the bug reports within the above link.

Fred

On 05.05.2012 13:10, Quentin Mathé wrote:
When I compile libobjc2 with 'make debug=no' and run a simple ObjC tool with 
valgrind, I get the failure below.
If I remove 'debug=no', valgrind runs just fine… Any idea?

I'm using libobjc2 from SVN trunk on Ubuntu Linux x86/32.

==2659== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==2659== Copyright (C) 2002-2009, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==2659== Using Valgrind-3.6.0.SVN-Debian and LibVEX; rerun with -h for 
copyright info
==2659== Command: obj/TestTool
==2659==
vex x86->IR: unhandled instruction bytes: 0x66 0x66 0x66 0x66
==2659== valgrind: Unrecognised instruction at address 0x479b2a3.
==2659== Your program just tried to execute an instruction that Valgrind
==2659== did not recognise.  There are two possible reasons for this.
==2659== 1. Your program has a bug and erroneously jumped to a non-code
==2659==    location.  If you are running Memcheck and you just saw a
==2659==    warning about a bad jump, it's probably your program's fault.
==2659== 2. The instruction is legitimate but Valgrind doesn't handle it,
==2659==    i.e. it's Valgrind's fault.  If you think this is the case or
==2659==    you are not sure, please let us know and we'll try to fix it.
==2659== Either way, Valgrind will now raise a SIGILL signal which will
==2659== probably kill your program.
==2659==
==2659== Process terminating with default action of signal 4 (SIGILL)
==2659==  Illegal opcode at address 0x479B2A3
==2659==    at 0x479B2A3: selector_insert (selector_table.c:188)
==2659==    by 0x47998DD: register_selector_locked (selector_table.c:260)
==2659==    by 0x479A665: objc_register_selector_copy (selector_table.c:359)
==2659==    by 0x4799DB4: sel_registerName (selector_table.c:440)
==2659==    by 0x47912FC: init_class_tables (class_table.c:43)
==2659==    by 0x47956D5: __objc_exec_class (loader.c:59)
==2659==    by 0x47A1B9E: .objc_load_function (properties.m:532)
==2659==    by 0x47A1DEC: ??? (in /Local/Library/Libraries/libobjc.so.4.6.0)
==2659==    by 0x478E603: ??? (in /Local/Library/Libraries/libobjc.so.4.6.0)
==2659==    by 0x400DBBB: call_init (dl-init.c:70)
==2659==    by 0x400DCD8: _dl_init (dl-init.c:134)
==2659==    by 0x400088E: ??? (in /lib/ld-2.11.1.so)
==2659==
==2659== HEAP SUMMARY:
==2659==     in use at exit: 107,765 bytes in 18 blocks
==2659==   total heap usage: 19 allocs, 1 frees, 107,790 bytes allocated



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]