|
From: | Fred Kiefer |
Subject: | Re: signature problem |
Date: | Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:12:18 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 SUSE/3.1.10 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 22.06.2011 09:50, David Chisnall wrote:
On 22 Jun 2011, at 08:46, Fred Kiefer wrote:I always hated that back installs its headers. These should never be used outside of back.I bet if you complained to the maintainer, he'd change the GNUmakefile so that it didn't... David
Not a chance, I know this guy, he is to lazy to do that :-)And as it turns out, I was wrong. There don't seem to be any installed header files in the System directory for back. You see, I was to lazy to even check :-(
Could different code paths end up with a different value forHAVE_LIBXEXT and thereby with a different data structure? Not that it matters too much, we just pass around a pointer to the data structure and the compiler should just be quite even when the structure seems to be different. Most likely we are missing an include for "config.h" in a file that uses XGServerWindow.h. Why not just include config.h directly in the header itself?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |