[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUstep improvements bounty
From: |
Riccardo |
Subject: |
Re: GNUstep improvements bounty |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:27:18 +0200 |
Hello,
On Friday, June 17, 2005, at 05:44 AM, Sheldon Gill wrote:
Also, as the GNUstep funds and administration are very limited, I'd
suggest it best that bounty tasks be small, contained and very well
defined. They should be work on the -core libraries which provide
benefit to large numbers of users.
I agree on this point, but I would broaden the perspective: applications
are important too. Thus a good and integrated HelpViewer could be a
nice thing. A good editor. A documentation browser. And many other tools
and apps we discussed so often.
I stress my point that it is only for the time being that I would stress
the importance of completing and stabilizing -core before adding more
meat to the fire.
You port your mega-app to gnustep thanks to coredata and coreimage and
then discover it is unreliable in operation because of some bug deep in
-core ? wouldn't you be frustrated?
-R
- GNUstep improvements bounty, Adam Fedor, 2005/06/15
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Nicolas Roard, 2005/06/15
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, David Ayers, 2005/06/16
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Fabien VALLON, 2005/06/16
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Adrian Robert, 2005/06/16
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Sheldon Gill, 2005/06/16
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty,
Riccardo <=
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Stefan Urbanek, 2005/06/17
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf, 2005/06/17
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2005/06/17
- Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Riccardo, 2005/06/17
Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Quentin Mathé, 2005/06/16
Re: GNUstep improvements bounty, Nicola Pero, 2005/06/17