Re: Release 1.0 and checklist: this deserves your attention.

[Richard Frith-Macdonald]

On 24 Feb 2005, at 10:53, Gregory John Casamento wrote:

> We need to focus on what milestones are needed to get to *GUI* and 
> *BACK* to
> 1.0 status.   Focusing on the mythical "GNUstep 1.0" doesn't help us, 
> since all
> of the packages are individually versioned.

I think the context was an attempt to simplify things for end users by 
establishing an
overarching version for the whole 'system'.

Frederic Stark raised the question of what is in 'GNUstep 1.0' ...

I'm also not clear what the 'system' is supposed to be ... certainly at 
least the core.
Possibly including applicationss as well.

I so no reason why 'GNUstep 1.0' should not consist of -
gnustep-make-1.10
gnustep-base-1.11
gnustep-gui-0.9.6
gnustep-back-0.9.5
Gorm-?.?
ProjectCenter-?.?
etc


I guess it's whatever can be made good/workable as a package ...
At present, my feeling is it would need to consist of all the core,
plus Gorm and probably GWorkspace and also the applications
from backbone (Terminal etc) with a little polishing.