[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUnet 0.6.3a released
From: |
Marcos D. Marado Torres |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUnet 0.6.3a released |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 06:59:21 +0100 (WEST) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Marcos D. Marado Torres wrote:
I'm curious of the results of this test in other gcc versions, specially on
gcc
3.4. If the problem occurs in 3.4, then I would say that most certainly this
is
an effect of some _permanent_ change on gcc since x.y.z < 3.2.2, and possibly
a bug.
Well, it doesn't. I just tryied this with "gcc (GCC) 3.4.1 (Debian 3.4.1-5)"
and the problem doesn't appear. I don't know if this happens with all gcc
3.4.*, but I'm convinced that this is a problem that isn't seen in any gcc 3.4.
Maybe the best thing to do is recomend the use of gcc 3.4?
Mind Booster Noori
- --
/* *************************************************************** */
Marcos Daniel Marado Torres AKA Mind Booster Noori
http://student.dei.uc.pt/~marado - address@hidden
() Join the ASCII ribbon campaign against html email, Microsoft
/\ attachments and Software patents. They endanger the World.
Sign a petition against patents: http://petition.eurolinux.org
/* *************************************************************** */
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFBFxK+mNlq8m+oD34RAn/oAKCtt8Yr9UTZuALR2t4X+Yuvj5g1TgCgpqwW
ieYvHZMjeo+tyPl8bUJNb58=
=VhFy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----