Re: [Gnumed-devel] 0.3.2 feedback: EMR tree

[Karsten Hilbert]

> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:54:53AM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:
> 
> > 6) we have been having discussion about the difference between clinical 
> > (disease) chronology -- as expressed by clin_when -- versus care / 
> > awareness and documentation chronology, as expressed by modified) when. I 
> > recently posted that both are important. I (mis?) understood that the EMR 
> > tree already used clin_when but it is not reflected by what I had put 
> > into the "Noted at Age or Year" fields.
> 
> It now does (the Journal, that is) - in CVS head. And if it
> is NULL it uses the start time of the associated encounter.
> 
> The health issues in the tree are ordered *alphabetically* !
> The users I asked wanted it that way.
> 
> > so I am wondering if this reflects that 2005 maybe only went into the  
> > field
> >
> >     clin.health_issue.age_noted
> It did but the view for the _journal uses it to create the
> clin_when.
> 
> > but better also be copied into the clin.clin_narrative.clin_when
> There is no such row by default.
> 
> > -- however what date to input when only the year or age, and not the  
> > month and date, were known?
> 
> That is unsolved.
> 
> Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346