[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Comments on 0.2
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Comments on 0.2 |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jun 2006 22:41:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 11:59:04AM +0800, Syan Tan wrote:
> has anyone used or know if savepoints work ok ?
used no, known-to-work yes going by the release notes of PG
> The problem is that I think you can
> only rollback to savepoint when it's issued explicitly,
yes
> i.e. for some reason
> ,e.g. the client
> application wants to rollback before an abort condition occurs. Once you hit
> the abort
> condition, (e.g. too late a concurrent write), I don't think rollback occurs
> back to the savepoint,
> but rather the whole transaction is aborted.
yes, you need to issue explicit savepoints
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Comments on 0.2, Syan Tan, 2006/06/20
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Comments on 0.2, Syan Tan, 2006/06/20
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Comments on 0.2,
Karsten Hilbert <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Comments on 0.2, kittylitter, 2006/06/21
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Comments on 0.2, Syan Tan, 2006/06/21
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Comments on 0.2, Tim Churches, 2006/06/22
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Comments on 0.2, Syan Tan, 2006/06/23
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Comments on 0.2, Syan Tan, 2006/06/24
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Comments on 0.2, Tim Churches, 2006/06/24