[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] editing of progress notes
From: |
Richard Terry |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] editing of progress notes |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:43:08 +1100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Personally I think that editing a progress note from another user SHOULD NEVER
BE ALLOWED EVER EVER EVER
address@hidden@address@hidden@address@hidden@address@hidden@address@hidden@#
As you can see I feel strongly about this.
Why would you allow that.
I write my clinical notes. If I make changes within my current session, those
changes should make up the medical record (not the bits I changed which
should not be recorded). The record should not be committed to the datbase
until I (the doctor) have decided that they should by hitting the save key,
or the consultation is over.
If I the doctor, want to then ammend/change, then this change is added
sequentially to the record. If someone else wants to add/change, it is added
sequentially to the record.
Regards
richard
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:17 am, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> What do people think:
>
> Should editing (eg intending to change) a progress
> note previously entered by another user result in ...
>
> ... a new progress note being generated and the old one being
> textually marked as "modified, see ..."
> ... the original progress note being changed to the new
> narrative attributed to the new user (the old one is still
> preserved in the audit log, of course)
>
> Clinicians, please !
>
> Karsten