Re: [Gnumed-devel] history types (was: little project for non-coders)

[J Busser]

At 11:05 AM +0100 12/14/04, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> If we do want to *encode* nesting arbitrarily constraining
> ourselves (in data, not in concept)

Meaning the code assigned to a "child" item would be an extension of 
the code used for the "parent" item? Making the code long (awkward) 
to use - unless auto-completion -- and up/down cursoring among values 
-- could be provided for tags?