[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Gnumed status
From: |
Hilmar Berger |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Gnumed status |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Mar 2003 22:21:14 +0100 (CET) |
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > |Module |related files |status
> > |maintainer|
> > |-----------------------------+---------------------------+--------+----------|
> > |Command line interface |gmCLI |pre-beta|karsten
> > |
> > |-----------------------------+---------------------------+--------+----------|
> > |Client configuration |gmCfg |pre-beta|karsten
> > |
> > |-----------------------------+---------------------------+--------+----------|
> > |I18N |gmI18N |pre-beta|karsten
> > |
> > |-----------------------------+---------------------------+--------+----------|
> > |Error/Status Logging |gmLog |pre-beta|karsten
> > |
> > |-----------------------------+---------------------------+--------+----------|
> If anyone knows of any major bugs/problems in these that
> prevent them from being considered beta quality I'd like to
> know about it right now :-)
>
> I haven't found a bug in quite a while and I DO employ them in
> nearly any of my projects whether GnuMed related or not.
>
> One criticism could be that there's no formalized test suite
> for them.
Today I tried to extend gmCfg and tested some settings that are not used
usually. Some bugs / features showed up that need further
work/investigation (I will check in changes within few days).
I therefore suggest that each piece of code has to be tested within gnumed
*and* within a reasonable testsuite before setting status to beta quality.
Hilmar
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Gnumed status,
Hilmar Berger <=