[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32
From: |
Arend Bayer |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32 |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:32:29 +0200 (CEST) |
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Daniel Bump wrote:
> So here's some more comments, this time for W:
A few more comments from my side -- I can somehow understand Marco's
feeling about the lack of some more solid direct contact moves.
> 28 at D3 is joseki (though a dangerous one when B responds
> at E3). W needs to know how to make sabaki after crosscutting.
And if W plays the (bad) E3/D3 exchange then it should probably follow-up
with D2 to get some shape.
It would happen rarely in a game between humans that W40 at Q8 produces no
immediate follow-ups locally.
> 44: since W has two weak groups, it had better defend G4
> or D12. (R12 or R15 now would also threaten the B group.)
> Instead, it defends a group that is already alive.
And isn't locally P7 a lot more effective?
> After 45, W would like to defend the defect at Q7. There
> is no time at move 46 for this, however.
Still, Q7 seems very undervalued with 8.10 pts. This is one of the
examples for my "experimental influence is bad in contact fights"-opinion.
(This particular case can probably be improved with an intrusion pattern.)
Arend
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32, (continued)
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32, Arend Bayer, 2002/04/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32, Marco Scheurer, 2002/04/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32, bump, 2002/04/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32, Trevor Morris, 2002/04/19
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32, Marco Scheurer, 2002/04/22
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32, bump, 2002/04/22
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/04/23
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32, Marco Scheurer, 2002/04/23
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32, Daniel Bump, 2002/04/23
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32, Marco Scheurer, 2002/04/23
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32,
Arend Bayer <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32, Gunnar Farneback, 2002/04/23
- Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32, Trevor Morris, 2002/04/23
Re: [gnugo-devel] 261 games 3.1.31 vs 3.1.32, Daniel Bump, 2002/04/19