Re: [gnugo-devel] trevor_1_20.5

[Daniel Bump]

Gunnar wrote:

>> +; xplay_defend_both(a,b,c,a,c) ||
>> +; xplay_defend_both(b,a,d,b,d)
>
>This constraint looks wrong. Surely the xplay_defend_both calls should
>be xplay_attack_either since O is in turn to play after the 3 moves?

I added this to the CVS and changed these to !xplay_attack_either
but it still looks wrong since often after X plays b, O would often be
able to connect by falling back to d.

Dan