[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:58:44 -0000 |
ZnU wrote:
>
> In article <4C580742.2EB401D9@web.de>,
> Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@web.de> wrote:
>
> > It's short and really nice.
> >
> > http://www.groklaw.net/pdf2/ApplevPsystarAppeal-21.pdf
> >
> > "This reply brief addresses Apples response on
> > copyright misuse as well as those unanticipated
> > arguments that Apple made in response to the
> > sealing-order and scope-of-the-injunction issues.
> >
> > COPYRIGHT MISUSE
> >
> > Copyright gives authors the right to control
> > the copying, creation of derivative works from, and
> > distribution of their works. As Apple correctly
> > points out, copyright allows authors to refuse to
> > allow others to do some or all of these things to
> > veto copying, the creation of derivative works, and
> > distribution of their creative output.
>
> [snip]
>
> I actually agree with Psystar's interpretation of copyright law.
> Software vendors have created this legal fiction that software is
> licensed, not sold, and therefore they have the right to apply all sorts
> of post-sale restrictions, something that everyone would consider absurd
> in other markets. The case law on this issue is all over the map. How
> the courts will ultimately decide is not at all clear.
Hey ZnU,
listen to
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/media/2010/06/07/09-35969.wma
Isn't it funny?
Context:
http://www.jdsupra.com/post/documentViewer.aspx?fid=23751953-233b-46bb-8e55-650986134ebe
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.)
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, (continued)
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, ZnU, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, ZnU, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Ivan Shmakov, 2010/12/09
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple,
Alexander Terekhov <=