[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple
From: |
Hyman Rosen |
Subject: |
Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:58:36 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 |
On 8/9/2010 4:06 PM, RJack wrote:
> Which court has said this about your vaunted GPL?
The CAFC has said it about the Artistic License in the
JMRI case, and the GPL has similar enough features that
it is reasonable to assume the same outcome.
In Progress v. MySQL, the court said
<http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13584730711160488510>
With respect to the General Public License ("GPL"), MYSQL has
not demonstrated a substantial likelihood of success on the
merits or irreparable harm. Affidavits submitted by the parties'
experts raise a factual dispute concerning whether the Gemini
program is a derivative or an independent and separate work
under GPL ΒΆ 2. After hearing, MySQL seems to have the better
argument here, but the matter is one of fair dispute. Moreover,
I am not persuaded based on this record that the release of the
Gemini source code in July 2001 didn't cure the breach.
indicating by context that the GPL is a meaningful license and the
arguments were to be about its details, not about its validity.
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, (continued)
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, Hyman Rosen, 2010/12/08
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple,
Hyman Rosen <=
- Re: Psystar's legal reply brief in response to Apple, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/12/08
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, RJack, 2010/12/08
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/12/08
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, Alan Mackenzie, 2010/12/08
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, Alexander Terekhov, 2010/12/08
- Re: Blowhard Bradley Kuhn and his fraud, devil_dude, 2010/12/09