On 5/18/2010 4:37 PM, RJack wrote:
So far, every plaintiff in a GPL lawsuit has cut and run prior to
the court ever reading the GPL contract -- must less judging it
terms.
The purpose of these lawsuits is to enforce copyright of GPL-covered
works. Since the defendants in all the concluded cases have come into
compliance with the GPL, the lawsuits accomplished their purpose.
Lawsuits do not continue when the parties no longer have a dispute.
Courts do not offer opinions for the satisfaction of cranks.
It is easily verfied that the term "compliance" has never been
raised in a GPL lawsuit -- must less enforced.
You are lying:
<http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2009/busybox-complaint-2009-12-14.pdf>
25. Plaintiffs have at no time granted any permission to any party to
copy, modify, or distribute BusyBox under any terms other than those
of the License. Plaintiffs do not permit anyone to distribute
BusyBox except in compliance with the License.