[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CAFC took JMRI case under advisement
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: CAFC took JMRI case under advisement |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:08:01 +0200 |
Hyman Rosen wrote:
>
> Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> > Hyman Rosen wrote:
> >> I still fail to understand what you find shocking
> >> about the citation of Nimmer.
> >
> > Go and drop am email to Nimmer et. al. asking whether a copyright
> > license is a contract or not. Let us know about his response.
>
> No, I don't think I will.
>
> People quote all sorts of stuff in lawsuits. In the case of this
> brief, it claims that a license is sufficiently like a contract
> that you can make similar claims for infringement.
>
> Here's an idea - why don't you go ahead and willfully defy the
> GPL on some piece of code, get yourself sued, and see how it all
> works out.
We all know how it works out.
1. Ignoring jurisdictional requirement SFLC files a complaint
(warranting atomatic dismissal).
2. Shortly thereafter SFLC moves to dismiss the case WITH PREJUDICE
against own clients (without any stipulation of settlement).
3. A face-saving press release appears claiming a "settlement" with
NON-DEFENDANT third party.
4. Defendant continues wilfully defy the GPL (from now on with impunity
due to res judicata since the case was dismissed WITH PREJUDICE against
plaintiffs).
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/06/verizon-ceo-doesnt-know-about.html
regards,
alexander.
--
http://gng.z505.com/index.htm
(GNG is a derecursive recursive derecursion which pwns GNU since it can
be infinitely looped as GNGNGNGNG...NGNGNG... and can be said backwards
too, whereas GNU cannot.