[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question to GPL LGPL
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Question to GPL LGPL |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:55:52 +0100 |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" wrote:
>
> The GPL is a contract to make a contract. It's uneforceable in all
> 50 US states under their common law.
>
> The GPL is a copyright license, and is enforceable in all 50 US states
> under copyright law.
Yet IBM talks about New York law on preambles and other prefatory
language in a contract aiding its interpretation. How come that,
oh paragon of intellect?
"the Court need not reach the choice of law issue because Utah law
and New York law are in accord on the issues that must be reached
to address SCO's sole argument on this motion, namely, that SCO did
not breach the GPL. Throughout this brief, IBM cites to both Utah
law and New York law."
regards,
alexander.
Message not available
- Re: Question to GPL LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/24
- Re: Question to GPL LGPL, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/11/24
- Re: Question to GPL LGPL, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2006/11/24
- Message not available
- Re: Question to GPL LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/24
- Re: Question to GPL LGPL, David Kastrup, 2006/11/25
- Re: Question to GPL LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/25
Message not availableRe: Question to GPL LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/24
Re: Question to GPL LGPL, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/11/24
Message not availableRe: Question to GPL LGPL, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/25
Re: Question to GPL LGPL, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra, 2006/11/25