[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Novell-MS Pact: Mono blah-blah
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: Novell-MS Pact: Mono blah-blah |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:41:34 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[... GPL _software_ copies ...]
> But it is a hurdle that one can't blame Easterbrook for.
Wallace's claim has absolutely nothing to do with software COPIES
(material objects), retard. And Easterbrook got it. As for blaming
Easterbrook... first off, it wasn't an appeal from a summary judgment.
He should have remanded the case back to the district court alone on
the grounds of his observation that "Although antitrust law serves
the interests of consumers rather than producers, the Supreme Court
has permitted producers to initiate predatory-pricing litigation" and
let Wallace and/or IBM et al move for summary judgment. Due process,
you know. Instead, EASTERBROOK invented a theory (Williams theory;
derivative of Wallace theory) and ruled himself on its validity
affirming that it's faulty. That's very exciting and entertaining,
but that's not what Wallace paid ($455) for.
regards,
alexander.
- Novell-MS Pact: Class action law suit?, (continued)
- Novell-MS Pact: Class action law suit?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/08
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: stripped down Linux kernel?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/08
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: Novellization, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/08
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: SEC complaint?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/08
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: PJ is still struggling to grok the deal, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/08
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: "Doctrine of Laches", eh?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/08
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: "why not?" says Linus, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/09
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: "precariously to developers who work in a vacuum" and EASTERBROOK, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/09
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: Mono blah-blah, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: Mono blah-blah, David Kastrup, 2006/11/10
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: Mono blah-blah,
Alexander Terekhov <=
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: Mono blah-blah, David Kastrup, 2006/11/10
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: Novell opens legal books to GPL pundits, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: "It's hard for corporate entities to really grasp the GPL. It's a learning process", Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: Novell opens legal books to GPL pundits, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: Novell opens legal books to GPL pundits, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/10
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: Samba Team calls upon Novell to work with the Software Freedom Law Center to undo the pact, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/13
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: "We will change the law such that ... we will reverse the legal consequences of this deal" says Eben, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/16
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: SFLC's arrangement with Novell?, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/20
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: "Free, well that means stuff you don't pay for... and we can never go bankrupt because we have no business to lose" says Eben, Alexander Terekhov, 2006/11/21
- Re: Novell-MS Pact: "Free, well that means stuff you don't pay for... and we can never go bankrupt because we have no business to lose" says Eben, rjack, 2006/11/21