Re: Question reguarding GNU FDL license

[Richard Tobin]

In article <45081CCC.D3B9CA09@web.de>,
Alexander Terekhov  <terekhov@web.de> wrote:

>> The "no charge" clause is for _licensing_, 

>And licensing to do what?

To distribute further copies of your copy, not to receive a copy in the
first place.  You don't need a licence to receive and use a copy.

A can charge B for a copy of GNU Emacs, but he can't charge B for the
right to give a copy to C.

But of course Terekhov knows this, he is just trying to muddy the waters.

-- Richard