[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java
From: |
Alexander Terekhov |
Subject: |
Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Dec 2004 22:48:42 +0100 |
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
> > Too bad that they don't have a German branch (making the same
> > claims) that can be shut up just like SCO Germany. Same law, I mean.
>
> The FSF Europe is situated in Germany.
Whey have neither "lgpl-java.html" nor stuff like the idiotic
GPL FAQ or the list of "incompatible" licenses on their web
site, to begin with. AFAICS, they also don't the sell any
software (FSF does) that would trigger "the course of doing
business" constraints (and penalties) under German
Wettbewerbsrecht.
http://tinyurl.com/2bnsh
http://www.spinics.net/lists/xf/msg02420.html
regards,
alexander.
- LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Robert Dodier, 2004/12/01
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/01
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, robert_dodier, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, David Kastrup, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, David Kastrup, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, David Kastrup, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, David Kastrup, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/02
- Re: LGPL reverse engineering clause & Java, Alexander Terekhov, 2004/12/02