Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Uruk GNU/Linux evaluation

[Ineiev]

Ahoj, Jaromil;

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:44:23PM +0200, Jaromil wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Ineiev wrote:
>
> > So far, we identified an issue with distribution channels: Uruk
> > GNU/Linux has no its own repositories; Ali suggested some solution,
> > but I'm not sure whether it's acceptable; I hope Ali will explain it
> > here.
>
> can you explain why it should be an issue for an 100% free distro to
> not have its own repositories?

The distro must be able to fix bugs in its packages; when they use other
people's repositories (which is the case for Uruk GNU/Linux) they
effectively can't do this (not directly).

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature