[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!!
From: |
Stig Brautaset |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!! |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Apr 2004 20:42:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Apr 09 2004, Michael wrote:
> "David Snopek" writes:
>
> > arch_commit: unable to acquire revision lock (could not rename file.)
> > tree: /home/xevol/prj/xmldoom.cvs
> > revision:
> > address@hidden/xmldoom--mainline--0.0--patch-5
> >
> > Anyone know why? Or how I could fix it? Please, please, I don't want to
> > recreate the archive again today. It is really tedious to do this and
> > takes away from productive time.
>
> Check the permissions on the archive -- that error suggests tla was
> unable to move the ++revision-lock directory from patch-4 (maybe
> patch-5?) to the parent directory, xmldoom--mainline--0.0. If you
> have more than one user committing to the archive, they absolutely
> *must* *all* have umask 002 and have the version directory
I had problems with this at work until I made /usr/local/bin/tla a shell
script that just set the umask to 002 and called the tla binary (from
/usr/local/lib/tla).
Stig
--
brautaset.org
- [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!, David Snopek, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!, Michael Poole, 2004/04/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!!,
Stig Brautaset <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!, David Snopek, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!, Charles Duffy, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!, Tom Lord, 2004/04/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!!, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!!, Tom Lord, 2004/04/12
- [Gnu-arch-users] newbie lockpicks, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!!, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/12
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!!, Greek0, 2004/04/12