[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bounty for tla on win32
|
From: |
Johannes Berg |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bounty for tla on win32 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:52:57 +0200 |
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 11:47, Jan Hudec wrote:
> Well, the NTFS long paths might be worth it. But strictly speaking, tla
> itself does not require them to understand the compressed paths, because
> the names used in diff header are set separately and not used anyway. It
> will be nice for the user, of course.
Ah. You're saying tla should give diff/patch the compressed path. Thats
going to be hard, tla doesn't even know the paths are compressed (right
now this is purely in hackerlab). I think the easier and cleaner
solution is to make diffutils use hackerlab, and I'm going to do this
next.
johannes
--
http://www.sipsolutions.de/
Key-ID: 9AB78CA5 Johannes Martin Berg <address@hidden>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Bounty for tla on win32, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bounty for tla on win32, Ron Parker, 2004/03/30
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Bounty for tla on win32, Johannes Berg, 2004/03/30