Re: address@hidden: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla1.2 on cygwin]

[Aaron Bentley]

Tom Lord wrote:

>    > From: Aaron Bentley <address@hidden>
>
>    > For archives, I can understand incompatible changes aren't
>    > happening any time soon.  Would changes to the revlib structure
>    > be permissible?
>
> Permissible?  Sure.   But why, exactly?
>
> -t
>  
I still find myself needing to manually kill revisions in revlibs on 
occasion, and it's awkward to navigate those directories.  It would also 
reduce tla's dependency on long path names.  If a new version of the 
Arch format was made, we could apply those changes at the same time.

Aaron