[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:50:48 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 07:23:54PM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
> > Tom> It would be helpful if you could list which files and
> functions you've
> > Tom> put into libarch-utils.
>
> > Ok, my "incomplete" checks so far are:
>
> > * it compiles and links
>
> > * I have checked that nothing in libarch-utils/* includes any include
> files
> > from libarch-cmds/*:
>
> That's a good sign. If you are using gcc, compile with -Wall. If
> libarch-utils is calling out to libarch-cmds, you should get some
> "undeclared function" warnings.
Throw in -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations as well or it'll
miss most of them. (And -Wstrict-prototypes gets you strong type
checking on functions)
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Pierce T . Wetter III, 2004/02/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Jeremy Shaw, 2004/02/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Brian May, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Jeremy Shaw, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Tom Lord, 2004/02/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Brian May, 2004/02/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Tom Lord, 2004/02/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla,
Andrew Suffield <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Tom Lord, 2004/02/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Brian May, 2004/02/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Tom Lord, 2004/02/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Brian May, 2004/02/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Tom Lord, 2004/02/28
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Brian May, 2004/02/29
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Colin Walters, 2004/02/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Miles Bader, 2004/02/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] libtla, Tom Lord, 2004/02/27