[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch implementing tla rm
From: |
Samuel Tardieu |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch implementing tla rm |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Feb 2004 01:54:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
T-gnus/6.16.2 (based on Gnus v5.10.2) (revision 02) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:
> If you need to pull them out of some branch and group them -- the
> easiest thing is to create a new branch, cherry-pick them into a
> project tree, and commit as a group.
It is a place where Darcs wins (by accepting to modify history). To be
more precise, in Darcs, one would:
% darcs unrecord -m <change1>
% darcs unrecord -m <change2>
% darcs record -a -m <newchangedescription>
Unrecord removes a patch from the repository but does not touch the
working directory.
Of course, those operations can lead to dependency problems if new
changes have been committed since change1 and change2. But Darcs will
notice this and propose to unrecord those conflicting changes too, to
let you do new record operations (equivalent of checkin in the local
repository) regarding those changes.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- address@hidden -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam
- [Gnu-arch-users] patch implementing tla rm, Stefanie Tellex, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch implementing tla rm, Cameron Patrick, 2004/02/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch implementing tla rm, Stefanie Tellex, 2004/02/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] patch implementing tla rm, Tom Lord, 2004/02/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch implementing tla rm,
Samuel Tardieu <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch implementing tla rm, Miles Bader, 2004/02/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch implementing tla rm, Samuel Tardieu, 2004/02/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch implementing tla rm, Miles Bader, 2004/02/22