[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates
From: |
Florian Weimer |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Feb 2004 06:32:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
Robert Collins wrote:
> > > 3. It appears that for a HEAD request, the content-length is 0. Can
> > > anyone confirm or deny?
> >
> > This looks like a server bug (it's a violation of a SHOULD in the RFC).
>
> not at all: from 9.2
> If no response body is included, the response MUST include a
> Content-Length field with a field-value of "0".
This is a requirement for the OPTIONS method, not the HEAD method.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Tom Lord, 2004/02/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Tom Lord, 2004/02/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Robert Collins, 2004/02/23
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Florian Weimer, 2004/02/21