[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Gnu-arch-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 51
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Gnu-arch-users Digest, Vol 2, Issue 51 |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:20:44 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:35:55PM -0700, Pierce T. Wetter III wrote:
> >> While tla is ok as a low-level tool, I've observed that everyone
> >>keeps trying to replace it with a driving script. That's a good
> >>instinct. For one thing, I think that:
> >>
> >> user--archive--task
> >>
> >> is harder to read then:
> >>
> >> tla make-archive --id address@hidden --name archive
> >>
> >> tla archive-setup --project hello-world --branch mainline --version
> >>0.1
> >
> >You have too much time on your hands.
>
> Well, that was kind of snide. You're only new to a tool once. Judging
> from the
> wiki, _everyone_ has problems grokking the blah--blah--blah format, why
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's pretty much wrong.
> not
> support breaking it up? It would be less confusing.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature