[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependen
From: |
Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:37:04 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Thu, Feb 19 2004 at 11:24:34PM BRT, Robert Collins <address@hidden> wrote:
> Your mirror probably doesn't have the cached revision.
Hmmm... True, it doesn't. Do I have to cacherev
address@hidden/zzbot--devel--0.1, is that it? Shouldn't
archive-mirror do that for me?
> That said, deleting the old archive is a generally bad idea, as you lose
> access to the detailed history.
I noticed that, I'll probably keep it somewhere. But, again,
shouldn't cacherev include the detailed history for the projects in
question? Perhaps via a command-line option? Sometimes you just have to
erase an archive (say, you'll have to format the machine, or you find out
you made a mess out of it, or your hard drive crashes and you simply lose it
all)...
Thanks a lot,
rbp
--
Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel <address@hidden>
http://isnomore.net GPG KeyId: <0x0DB14978>
Philosophers [...] say a great deal about what is "absolutely necessary"
for science, and it is always [...] rather naive, and probably wrong.
-- Richard Feynman, "The Feynman Lectures on Physics"
- [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel, 2004/02/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Robert Collins, 2004/02/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?,
Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Cameron Patrick, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel, 2004/02/20
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Miles Bader, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Miles Bader, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Jean Helou, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Miles Bader, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag'ged (branched) and cacherev'ed archive dependency?, Rodrigo Bernardo Pimentel, 2004/02/20