[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validat
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation) |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:40:52 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 05:44:47PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> >> Bigger, sure, but "much bigger"? Really?
> >> > About two or three orders of magnitude bigger.
> >> Huh? You mean that the Emacs archive is about 100 to 1000 times larger
> >> than a checked out Emacs tree (which weighs at about 50MB) ?
> > No, a revision library.
>
> So you're saying that a revlib is "much bigger" or that what I want is "much
> bigger" than a revlib? I think you mean the first.
>
> I already have a revlib (a cache of full-fledged revisions) but
> I additionally want to cache things like patches. I don't think those
> extra patches will blow up the whole thing by a factor of 100 or 1000.
Pay attention to context. If I'd been talking about that, I'd have
replied in the subthread where you were talking about that.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Charles Duffy, 2004/02/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Andrew Suffield, 2004/02/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation), Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: corrupt library (failed inode signature validation),
Andrew Suffield <=