[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 11:00:36 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 10:28:36AM -0500, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> Well, I do have a philosophical objection. It's not a strong one, but
> here it is: tla is a C program, which makes it very performant for some
> kinds of operations. But it's not a particularly fast language to write
> in.
That might be a good objection in many cases, but not in this one. Adding it
to the C code would be be absurdly simple.
`Let's not bloat tla' is a soothing cry, but I think that this particular
change would have both very high usefulness-to-effort _and_
usefulness-to-bloat ratios.
-Miles
--
`There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.'
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, James Blackwell, 2004/02/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Miles Bader, 2004/02/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Tom Lord, 2004/02/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Brian May, 2004/02/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Robert Collins, 2004/02/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Brian May, 2004/02/08
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Miles Bader, 2004/02/05
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/06
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Tom Lord, 2004/02/06
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Auto-registration, Stefan Monnier, 2004/02/06