[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tutorial questions
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tutorial questions |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 23:47:01 +1100 |
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 08:18, C. R. Oldham wrote:
> I did so, and the output is missing the New-files: line indicating
>
> {arch}/[...]/hello-world--mainline--0.1/[...]/patch-log/patch-2
>
> was added to the archive. The Modified-files: and the New-patches:
> lines are present however. Was this just a feature change to remove the
> new files line since it is obvious that patch-2 would be in the archive
> since the New-patches line indicates it was applied?
Not sure offhand, I've dropped this in my TODO.
> Secondly, the next instruction in the the tutoral instructs me to check
> out from Candice's archive
>
> tla get -A address@hidden \
> hello-world--candice--0.1--patch-2 \
> hw-C-0
>
> When I do so I get
>
> * from archive cached:
> address@hidden/hello-world--candice--0.1--base-0
>
> ********************************
> MISMATCHED ARCHIVE CHECKSUM
>
> archive: address@hidden
> revision: hello-world--candice--0.1--base-0
> file: hello-world--candice--0.1--base-0.tar.gz
>
> expected: 1385989ead1e8ea953cf88dc104f0047
> got: 72dc72eb0e8243a568436ad254aba5c6
>
> ********************************
>
> I don't have the slightest clue what I might have done to cause that. I
> have followed the tutorial instructions to the letter. Suggestions? Is
> there some way to ignore the checksum so I can see if the checked out
> source code is indeed corrupt? It scares me because if it is not a bug
> then it makes me think it is easy to corrupt my archives...
rename the checksums file to something else. Short answer though:
Something has diddled the tarball and altered it behinds tla's back.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part