Re: [gNewSense-users] is Dapper Drake more stable than gNewSense?

[Karl Goetz]

On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:18:09 -0400
Patrick DeBoard <address@hidden> wrote:

> I'm just wondering, 'cause I've been having fits with gns.  it seems 
> like we gns users are working out the bugs in it, or am I mistaken?
> I did like Ubuntu's simplicity.  It seemed to rarely give me
> problems, too, so i'm wondering if it's better for a non-geek dork
> like myself. Thanks :)
> 

Just FYI, gNS 1.x was based on Dapper. gNS 2.x is based on Hardy. I
could easily believe that Dapper is more stable - its been out for 2
years longer. However, our 1.x is no longer supported by gNS.
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian user / gNewSense contributor
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature