[gNewSense-users] GPL license in code

[Peter and Jesse]

What is our practice for the MODULE_LICENSE and EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL
functions? drivers/s390 has files that don't state a license in the
comments but have MODULE_LICENSE("GPL") or
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(somethingorother) in the code.
On the one hand, the authors are clearly intending the code to be GPL.
On the other, it raises questions about our process. Ideas?

Relevant (but 8-year-old) linux-kernel thread:
http://ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0110.2/0369.html.

Relevant files:
http://wiki.gnewsense.org/Kernel/Ubuntu-hardy-linux-2-6-24-12-22--drivers--s390--block--dasd-devmap-c
http://wiki.gnewsense.org/Kernel/Ubuntu-hardy-linux-2-6-24-12-22--drivers--s390--block--dasd-c

 Peter