[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] PFV call for help.
From: |
Karl Goetz |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] PFV call for help. |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:29:02 +1030 |
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 17:31 +0800, Christophe Jarry wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I think the license of xserver-xorg-driver-nsc isn't free because the
> section containing: "Under CURRENT (2001) U.S. export regulations this
> software is eligible for export from the U.S. and can be downloaded by
> or otherwise exported or reexported worldwide EXCEPT to U.S. embargoed
> destinations which include Cuba, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Iran, Syria,
> Sudan, Afghanistan and any other country to which the U.S. has embargoed
> goods and services." may not suit freedom 2: The freedom to redistribute
> copies so you can help your neighbor. So i disagree with bbrian
> regarding this point.
according to this link [1], dapper is the only version of ubuntu with
this package. i dont know if the code is gone after this, or just
renamed, but its handy to note.
[1].
http://packages.ubuntu.com/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=xserver-xorg-driver-nsc&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
>
> Moreover, I think the license of krb5
> (http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/k/krb5/krb5_1.4.3-5ubuntu0.2/)
>
> has two unclear sections regarding freedom:
>
> * line 18-21: "Export of this software from the United States of America
> may require
> a specific license from the United States Government. It is the
> responsibility of any person or organization contemplating export to
> obtain such a license before exporting."
> This section may not suit freedom 2: The freedom to redistribute copies
> so you can help your neighbor.
>
> * line 81-83: "OpenVision
> also retains copyright to derivative works of the Source Code, whether
> created by OpenVision or by a third party." I think this could threat
> this software freedom.
Forwarded this query to debian-legal for their opionions (no their not
lawyers, but licences their thing, and its also a debian problem).
They are also only going ot look at it from a DFSG freeness perspective,
but if it fails that, it fails the FSFs 4.
kk
sid:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/k/krb5/krb5_1.6.dfsg.3~beta1-2/copyright
>
> pitof
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gNewSense-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
--
Karl Goetz <address@hidden>
Debian / Ubuntu / gNewSense
- Re: [gNewSense-users] PFV call for help., (continued)
Re: [gNewSense-users] PFV call for help., marco\.chieppa-crap, 2008/01/16
Re: [gNewSense-users] PFV call for help., marco\.chieppa-crap, 2008/01/21
Re: [gNewSense-users] PFV call for help., marco\.chieppa-crap, 2008/01/21
Re: [gNewSense-users] PFV call for help., marco\.chieppa-crap, 2008/01/23