[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?
From: |
Matthew Flaschen |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ? |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:35:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) |
Karl Goetz wrote:
> One thing that is required for a distribution to be FSF free is not
> hosting non-free content in its repositories - and i dont see ubuntu
> loosing multiverse or restricted.
If they make a separate GNUbuntu repository without unfree software, I
will tolerate multiverse and restricted staying in the Ubuntu repository.
> Unless they deliberately break binary compatibility between the two
> versions, the new ubuntu winds up non-free by default.
I don't know exactly what you mean. Making it free will probably
necessitate breaking compatibility, but that's not itself a criteria to me.
Matthew Flaschen
- [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Andreas, 2007/04/12
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Kevin Dean, 2007/04/12
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Matthew Flaschen, 2007/04/12
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?,
Matthew Flaschen <=
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Koh Choon Lin, 2007/04/12
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Matthew Flaschen, 2007/04/12
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Guy Johnston, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Koh Choon Lin, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Matthew Flaschen, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Koh Choon Lin, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Mitch Wiedemann, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Matthew Flaschen, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Mitch Wiedemann, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Karl Goetz, 2007/04/15