[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: Important bug reports (GNU documentation missing
From: |
Karl Goetz |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Re: Important bug reports (GNU documentation missing) |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Jun 2010 22:37:20 +0930 |
On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 23:23:07 +0200
address@hidden wrote:
> During my work on packaging GNU documentation for gNewSense metad, I
> found some strange things, which may be bugs to be reported to GNU:
>
> -in GCC-4.5.0 source code:
>
> -most of the documentation is under the GNU FDL v1.2 or later,
> while it should be under GNU FDL v1.3 or later (cpp.info, gcc.info,
> gccinstall.info, gccint.info, gcj.info, gfortran.info, gnat*.texi,
> libgomp.info);
why should it? 1.2 or later is pretty much the same as 1.3 or later.
> -'gfortran.info' is copyrighted by the FSF '1999-2008', although
> it should be under the form '1999, 2000, [other years], 2008';
Why? there is no requirement to specify every year one at a time. is
this a style requirement of gnu doco?
> -in Binutils-2.20.1 source code:
>
> -'standards.info' is under GFDL v1.2 or later instead of GFDL v1.3
> or later;
As above.
> -some files have FSF copyright years written in the form '99'
> instead of '1999' (as.info, gprof.info, ld.info), I don't know if
> this matters much.
well... will the docs still be around in 90 years? ;)
> -in GDB-7.1 source code:
>
> -most of the documentation is released under the GNU FDL v1.1 or
> later (annotate.info, gdb.info, gdbint.info, stabs.info) or GNU FDL
> v1.2 or later (standards.info), while it should be under GNU FDL
> v1.3 or later.
what does 1.3 or later provide over 1.2 or later for this
documentation??
> For my 'gnu-doc' package, I plan to use the 'bfd.info' file released
> in gdb-7.1 source code, which is more recent than binutils-2.20.1
> one. Do you think it is a problem to include latest versions of GNU
> documentation in 'gnu-doc' package, while GNU software available in
> gNewSense metad is older?
i'd say its a problem, since part of the point here is getting the
correct doco for the software we are shipping.
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature