gnewsense-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Mono in the default install


From: Sam Geeraerts
Subject: Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Mono in the default install
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 23:50:59 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608)

Robert Millan schreef:
Hi,

As you might have heard, Richard Stallman has recently written an article,
positioning himself against including Mono by default, and discouraging
it as a platform for developing free software:

  http://www.fsf.org/news/dont-depend-on-mono

The SFLC [1] and other members of the free software community [2] have made
statements backing Stallman's position.

I agree with Richard that this is a serious problem which could in the future
cause great harm to our community if left unstopped (I disagree, however, in
the way Microsoft will use to attack us; if you want to know my own opinion,
I wrote an essay about this in my blog [3]).

This matter concerns gNewSense because the i386/amd64 version is shipping Mono
by default (as a dependency for Tomboy and F-Spot, AFAICS).

IMHO it should be considered among the gNewSense community to avoid promoting
Mono whenever possible.  There's a replacement for Tomboy, Gnote [4], which is
almost identical to Tomboy, and there are a number of high-quality replacements
for F-Spot.  Fortunately, at this time the move I'm proposing doesn't involve
a great loss.

What does everyone think about this?


[1] http://www.softwarefreedom.org/blog/2009/jun/29/language-patents/

[2] http://blogs.fsfe.org/adridg/?p=157
    http://planet.gnu.org/gnutelephony/?p=3

[3] 
http://robertmh.wordpress.com/2009/07/01/mono-is-not-a-patent-threat-for-debian/

[4] As I announced earlier in this list, Gnote is already in the default
    install for gNewSense metad (mipsel & powerpc).  Note that at that
    time, Mono was not an option for metad anyway, since it doesn't
    support mipsel:
    http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnewsense-dev/2009-05/msg00024.html

I don't think the free software community will get much heat from MS about C#. Unless it starts becoming a real competitor to MS's implementation, that is. I agree that it's not good to encourage dependencies on C#, so I think you should open bug reports for the applications that should be replaced, but I'd mark them as "Wishlist".

I know Gnote is a valid alternative for Tomboy, but it would have to be backported. I don't know about alternative for F-Spot. Last time I checked I didn't find a lot of (actively developed) similar applications, but then I don't use that kind of software. Perhaps someone could make a comparison of features of the available apps so it would be easier to choose a replacement.

Are there any volunteers who'd like to implement this?




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]