[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity
From: |
strk |
Subject: |
[Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:58:34 +0100 |
Due to recent discussion with Rob, this mail is
to get a shared interpretation of the Severity
field we have for bugs:
1. Wish
2. Minor
3. Normal
4. Important
5. Blocker
6. Security
So far I've always used 'Security' for memory violations
or (more rarely) for privacy violation behaviours.
"Blocker" I've used mostly to mean "release blocker",
that is something you should fix before next release.
"Important" is something people will be likely to complain
a lot about (say support for latest YouTube change).
Normal and down I dubt we have strong arguments about.
So, what do other think about those definition ?
--strk;
() Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
/\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
- [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity,
strk <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Rob Savoye, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, strk, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Rob Savoye, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, strk, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Rob Savoye, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, strk, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Rob Savoye, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, strk, 2010/12/20
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Definition of "blocker" bug severity, John Gilmore, 2010/12/20
[Gnash-dev] Re: Definition of "blocker" bug severity, Petter Reinholdtsen, 2010/12/20