Re: [Gnash-commit] gnash ChangeLog server/sprite_instance.cpp serv...

[zou lunkai]

execute_state_reverse()  calls  execute_state(), and then
execute_state() calls execute().  so m->add_display_object() is always
called in execute(). How can we know if add_display_object()  is
called in reverse execution or not if we don't have a another
variable?

I know that class sprite_instance is already too big...

On 4/2/07, strk <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 06:18:41AM +0000, Zou Lunkai wrote:
> > CVSROOT:      /sources/gnash
> > Module name:  gnash
> > Changes by:   Zou Lunkai <zoulunkai>  07/04/02 06:18:41
> >
> > Modified files:
> >       .              : ChangeLog
> >       server         : sprite_instance.cpp sprite_instance.h
> >       server/swf     : tag_loaders.cpp
> >
> > Log message:
> >       improvement of reverse execution
>
> Do we really need yet another sprite_instance private member for this ?
> Since we're calling execute_state_reverse() when in reverse mode why
> isn't that enough to know ?
>
> --strk;
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnash-commit mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-commit