Re: [Gm2] Small omission in Glibc.c

[Gaius Mulley]

Ernst Bokkelkamp <address@hidden> writes:

> I found a small omission in Glibc.c that causes a problem under Raspbian
> Jessie:
>
> ---
> ./GM2_520/gcc-5.2.0+gm2-git-latest/gm2/gcc-versionno/gcc/gm2/mc-boot-ch/Glib
> c.c     2017-03-21 21:34:42.000000000 +0100
> +++
> ./GM2_520_fixed/gcc-5.2.0+gm2-git-latest/gm2/gcc-versionno/gcc/gm2/mc-boot-c
> h/Glibc.c       2017-03-27 16:49:36.980048646 +0200
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
>
>  int libc_close (int fd)
>  {
> -  close (fd);
> +  return close (fd);
>  }
>
>  int libc_exit (int code)
>
> With the fix I obtained the following results:
>
> Linux debian 3.16.0-4-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.16.36-1+deb8u2 (2016-10-19)
> i686 GNU/Linux
> # of expected passes            10340
> # of unexpected failures        30
> # of unresolved testcases       6
>
> Linux debian3 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.39-1 (2016-12-30) x86_64
> GNU/Linux
> # of expected passes            10352
> # of unexpected failures        18
> # of unresolved testcases       6
>
> Linux raspi3p3 4.4.50+ #970 Mon Feb 20 19:12:50 GMT 2017 armv6l GNU/Linux
> # of expected passes            10340
> # of unexpected failures        30
> # of unresolved testcases       6
>
> Regards
> Ernst

Hi Ernst,

many thanks for the bug report - will apply the fix.  I've also moved
some of the test cases around, which should result in fewer failures.
[Which will be git pushed today].  I wonder if you can email me the
gm2.sum file found in: build-5.2.0/gcc/testsuite/gm2.sum, if so then
I'll add it to the regression test table

regards,
Gaius