[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for some RPM packaging changes
From: |
James |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for some RPM packaging changes |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 11:48:15 -0500 |
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Kaleb KEITHLEY <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Actually, it doesn't.
>
> glusterfs-geo-replication _does_ reguire glusterfs-server.
>
> glusterfs-server _does not_ require glusterfs-geo-replication.
This makes sense, and is what I'd expect... And with that, as long as
it's not pedantic, I'd recommend they stay as separate packages. It
makes total sense that geo-replication pulls in glusterfs-server, but
not the other way around.