Re: [Gluster-devel] Re: Multiple AFR instances on same storage bricks

[Anand Avati]

are the protocol/client's pointing bacck to the same glusterfsd IP/remote
volume as a loop? If so it is a problem... i dont think i understood your
problem.. can you give a more specific example?


avati

2007/12/11, Sam Douglas <address@hidden>:
>
> [damn email interface... tab then space caused it to send early]
>
> volume brick1
>     type storage/posix
>     ...
> end-volume
>
> volume client1
>    type protocol/client
>    ...
> end-volume
>
> volume client2
>    ...
> end-volume
>
> volume afr
>     type cluster/afr
>     option replicate *:3
>     subvolumes brick1 client1 client2
> end-volume
>
> volume server
>     # Export the bricks
> end-volume
>
> --
>
> Would there be any issues with multiple different AFR instances
> working on the same storage volumes?
>
> -- Sam Douglas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account
Hofstadter's Law.

-- Hofstadter's Law