[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gcmd-dev] Build error CVS
From: |
Piotr Eljasiak |
Subject: |
Re: [gcmd-dev] Build error CVS |
Date: |
Thu, 04 May 2006 00:38:11 +0200 |
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 13:45 +0200, Magnus Stålnacke wrote:
> >>main.c:93: error: "GNOME_PARAM_GOPTION_CONTEXT" odeklarerad (första
> >
> >
> > GNOME_PARAM_GOPTION_CONTEXT comes from gnome-2.14.0... Yesterday I was
> > so excited that I got doc framework working at last that I hadn't
> > checked it for that :o(
> >
> > Now I have to admit I'm at a loss here - I don't want to add additional
> > dependencies to gcmd, but on the other hand the alternate is to use
> > GNOME_PARAM_POPT_TABLE. Unfortunately GNOME docs say:
> >
> > GNOME_PARAM_POPT_TABLE is deprecated and should not be used in
> > newly-written code. 2.14. Use GOption argument parsing instead,
> > with GNOME_PARAM_GOPTION_CONTEXT.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
>
> I am not sure what you are saying here, but i
> interpret it as the doc framework needs a "bleeding edge"
> gnome to work, and that something that would work for
> the average user is deprecated and should not be used.
> Right?
>
> In that case Gnome are almost saying that developers
> should skip to develop any doc framework for the next
> year or so (probably longer).
>
> Does gcmd really need this?
>
> Maybe just use plain old textfiles or the man page,
> those do work...
I've just changed it to use (now obsolete) GNOME_PARAM_POPT_TABLE
parameter in gcmd init... The offending code is commented out and ready
for re-usage when gnome-2.14 isn't to fresh ;o) Hope, it'll work now.
BTW - this change should be independent of help framework.
Piotr
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [gcmd-dev] Build error CVS,
Piotr Eljasiak <=