[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results
From: |
Vadim V. Zhytnikov |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 22:39:29 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru-RU; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040407 |
Camm Maguire writes:
<snip>
b) Shortly after writing this, I will put up at
http://people.debian.org/~camm/gabriel.tgz
the benchmark suite I used with the slight modifications as
mentioned on the web page. I'd be most appreciative if
those in the know could run this suite as well, as well as
look it over for mistakes/oversights.
Please do it. I'd like to repeat your benchmarks on
the Athlon XP 300. Maybe some tests under considiration are
strongly CPU dependent (Pentium 4 vs Athlon). At leat I know
some other lisp tests (Reduce CAS test with Portable Standard
Lisp) which dislikes Pentium 4 and favor Pentium III and
especially Athlon - Pentium 4 is 2-3 (!!!) times slower.
<snip>
Peter Graves <address@hidden> writes:
Hi,
There was a little discussion on #lisp yesterday about the benchmark
results on this page:
http://people.debian.org/~camm/GCL_2_6_2_tests.html
To add another data point, I ran the Boyer benchmark on GCL CVS head
(built with --enable-ansi) and several other implementations, using an
Athlon XP 2100+ machine running Linux 2.6.0, with the results below.
The benchmark I used was extracted from Eric Marsden's cl-bench suite
and is available here:
http://armedbear.org/boyer.lisp
I added (declaim (optimize speed)) at the top of the file (and turned
off *gc-verbose* for CMUCL).
For each system, I simply did (compile-file "boyer.lisp"), (load *),
and then (test 100) 3 times.
GET-INTERNAL-RUN-TIME was used for timing.
The results (best of 3 runs for each system):
I confirm these results on Linux 2.4.26,
Athlon XP 3000+, 512Mb
GCL (GNU Common Lisp) 2.7.0 ANSI Jun 17 2004 17:50:11
3.22 seconds
GCL 2.6.2 ANSI - 2.78 seconds
CMU Common Lisp CVS release-18e-branch + minimal debian patches
2.87 seconds
CMUCL 18e - 2.26 seconds
SBCL 0.8.11
2.592 seconds
SBCL 0.8.8 - 2.54 seconds
Allegro CL 6.2 Trial Edition
3.79 seconds
ACL 6.2 Trial - 3.79 seconds (?)
CLISP 2.33.1 (2004-05-22)
18.059256 seconds
CLISP 2.33.1 - 15.48 seconds
ABCL 0.0.3.15+ (Jun 17 2004 12:21:53) (Java 1.5.0-beta2)
16.786 seconds
-Peter
--
Vadim V. Zhytnikov
<address@hidden>
- [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Peter Graves, 2004/06/18
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results,
Vadim V. Zhytnikov <=
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/21
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Peter Graves, 2004/06/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Christophe Rhodes, 2004/06/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Christophe Rhodes, 2004/06/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Raymond Toy, 2004/06/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/29
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/06/23
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Boyer benchmark results, Camm Maguire, 2004/06/23